<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TSP2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tsp2.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tsp2.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>2011 Highway Deaths fall to Record Lows</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/2011-highway-deaths-fall-to-record-lows/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2011-highway-deaths-fall-to-record-lows</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/2011-highway-deaths-fall-to-record-lows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data/Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/16/2011-highway-deaths-fall-to-record-lows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Warne Report, 14 May 2012 Associated Press – May 7, 2012 WASHINGTON – Highway deaths in 2011 dropped to their lowest rate since record-keeping began in 1921, according to preliminary government data released this week. The National Highway Traffic &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/2011-highway-deaths-fall-to-record-lows/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Warne Report, 14 May 2012</strong></p>
<div><em>Associated Press – </em>May 7, 2012</div>
<p><em>WASHINGTON – </em>Highway deaths in 2011 dropped to their lowest rate since record-keeping began in 1921, according to preliminary government data released this week. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator’s early estimate of last year’s fatalities said 32,310 deaths in vehicle crashes last year was a 1.7 percent decline from the previous year, and is the lowest recorded in 60 years.</p>
<p>Safety experts attribute the drop to several factors, including the decline in driving due to a weak economy, better safety equipment in cars, more seat belt wearing and efforts to cut drunk driving. Overall, traffic deaths have fallen 26 percent since 2005.</p>
<p>Jackie Gillan, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, said the trend is a good sign, but cautioned against complacency. “You are still losing 32,000 people a year,” Gillan said. “And we still don’t know whether when the economy comes back and is really robust, what that is going to do.” In the past, when “the economy bounces back and people are doing more discretionary driving and things like that,” highway deaths have gone back up, she said.</p>
<p>The number of miles driven on U.S. highways declined last year by 35.7 billion miles, or 1.2 percent, according to the safety administration. There were 1.09 deaths for every 100 million miles traveled down from 1.11 deaths in 2010, and is the lowest rate on record, the NHTSA reported.</p>
<blockquote><p>The decline is clearly the product of many factors. Miles driven reduced at a lesser rate than the fatalities so attributing the improvement only to the economy would be misleading. I believe continued improvement in the quality of our roads and highways, enforcement efforts and the many changes and improvements in our vehicles also contributed to this new record. When I was the director of UDOT we had a very serious issue with fatalities on SR-6 from Spanish Fork to Price. Over the last ten years the agency has built passing lanes and widened major parts of the highway resulting in a marked reduction in deaths. On the side of safety equipment in cars I am the personal benefactor of air bags having just survived serious injury just last week when a deer and I met late one night on a rural highway in Indiana. 32,000 is good; let’s keep up the momentum. TW</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/2011-highway-deaths-fall-to-record-lows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NH and Maine Agree on $172M for Long Bridge</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/nh-and-maine-agree-on-172m-for-long-bridge/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nh-and-maine-agree-on-172m-for-long-bridge</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/nh-and-maine-agree-on-172m-for-long-bridge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bridge Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridge Pres. Apps.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Pres. Apps.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/16/nh-and-maine-agree-on-172m-for-long-bridge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Warne Report, 14 May 2012 Seacoastonline.com – May 8, 2012 PORTSMOUTH – Maine and New Hampshire have made a significant step toward replacing the Sarah Mildred Long Bridge by 2017 by agreeing to spend $171.7 million on the project. &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/nh-and-maine-agree-on-172m-for-long-bridge/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Warne Report, 14 May 2012</strong></p>
<div><em>Seacoastonline.com – </em>May 8, 2012</div>
<p><em>PORTSMOUTH – </em>Maine and New Hampshire have made a significant step toward replacing the Sarah Mildred Long Bridge by 2017 by agreeing to spend $171.7 million on the project. A preliminary study performed by HNTB outlines the cost and proposed work for the new bridge; the current plan calls for building adjacent to the existing span. A traffic bridge would be built a level above a railroad bridge, as is the current bridge.</p>
<p>“We have a broad direction and we’re moving forward,” said Maine Deputy Transportation Commissioner Bruce Van Note. “Both states believe the Long Bridge project is a very high priority. Now we’re in the problem-solving mode. How do we get there?”</p>
<p>Van Note said the two DOT’s have held “very productive and collaborative meetings,” to work on a compromise as Maine’s legislature has been set on a rehabilitation of the current bridge, while New Hampshire officials have argued that no money will be spent on the bridge unless it is elongated to handle the next generation of cargo vessels to travel to New Hampshire ports upriver.</p>
<p>The study cost estimates are $41.7 million more than originally budgeted for the project and both DOTs agree that finding the funding for the project is the first priority. “Securing the funds is an outstanding issue,” Van Note said. “Both states know it. It’s going to require extraordinary federal funding.” He said actual construction will likely begin in late 2014 at the earliest, which is a year later than originally planned because permits for a new bridge will take longer than for a rehabilitated one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/nh-and-maine-agree-on-172m-for-long-bridge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillsborough Halts New Road Projects</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/hillsborough-halts-new-road-projects/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hillsborough-halts-new-road-projects</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/hillsborough-halts-new-road-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/16/hillsborough-halts-new-road-projects/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Warne Report, 14 May 2012 The Tampa Tribune – May 9, 2012 TAMPA – All new roads projects in Hillsborough County, Florida have been put off for the foreseeable future by county officials because of a decline in funding &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/hillsborough-halts-new-road-projects/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Warne Report, 14 May 2012</strong></p>
<div><strong><em>The Tampa Tribune – </em>May 9, 2012</strong></div>
<p><em>TAMPA – </em>All new roads projects in Hillsborough County, Florida have been put off for the foreseeable future by county officials because of a decline in funding in recent years from a voter-approved sales tax. The county’s share of the half-cent Community Investment Tax approved in 1996, has dropped by nearly 17 percent from the $49.6 million high in 2007. Use of the tax is limited to construction projects such as schools, fire stations and roads. The revenue hit an all-time low of $41.2 million in 2010, and has since come back in the first few months of this budget year, rising five percent since Oct. 1.</p>
<p>The downward trend has weakened the county’s borrowing power, and with the tax set to expire in 2016, the tax does not have the capacity to pay back future bond issues to pay for road and other construction. The county deferred $124 million in planned road work through 2014 because of falling tax revenues. Now those projects and any others needed to accommodate population growth are being shelved indefinitely, according to county chief financial administrator Bonnie Wise.</p>
<p>“It declined for several years,” Wise said. “Now, with the end in sight for 2026, we just don’t have the CIT funds available to fund capital projects. It’s going to continue to be a problem.” The county will continue work on projects already in progress, which are partially funded by a six-cent-per-gallon gas tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/hillsborough-halts-new-road-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transportation Funding Commissions</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/transportation-funding-commissions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=transportation-funding-commissions</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/transportation-funding-commissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies / Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/16/transportation-funding-commissions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Council of State Governments has released a brief that highlights the experience of four panels in Iowa, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Washington that were established to develop recommendations on ways to fund transportation within their states. The brief addresses the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/transportation-funding-commissions/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Council of State Governments has released a brief that highlights the experience of four panels in Iowa, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Washington that were established to develop recommendations on ways to fund transportation within their states.</p>
<p>The brief addresses the panels’ processes, findings, and how their funding recommendations have fared politically.</p>
<p><a href="http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/drupal/system/files/cr_transportation_funding_commissions_1.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Brief</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/transportation-funding-commissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fleet Management Commitment to Fuel Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/fleet-management-commitment-to-fuel-efficiency/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fleet-management-commitment-to-fuel-efficiency</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/fleet-management-commitment-to-fuel-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies / Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/16/fleet-management-commitment-to-fuel-efficiency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Zealand Transport Agency has released a report that identifies potential ways to overcome barriers faced by managers of New Zealand&#8217;s light and heavy vehicle fleets in attempting to implement fuel efficiency as part of their normal way of &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/fleet-management-commitment-to-fuel-efficiency/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Zealand Transport Agency has released a report that identifies potential ways to overcome barriers faced by managers of New Zealand&#8217;s light and heavy vehicle fleets in attempting to implement fuel efficiency as part of their normal way of doing business.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/research/reports/482/docs/482.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Report</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/fleet-management-commitment-to-fuel-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FHWA Focus Magazine: April 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/fhwa-focus-magazine-april-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fhwa-focus-magazine-april-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/fhwa-focus-magazine-april-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals/Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/16/fhwa-focus-magazine-april-2012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Highway Administration has released the latest version of its Focus magazine, which highlights efforts designed to accelerate infrastructure innovations in order to build better, safer roads. Read Focus Magazine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Highway Administration has released the latest version of its Focus magazine, which highlights efforts designed to accelerate infrastructure innovations in order to build better, safer roads.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/focus/12may/focus5_12.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read Focus Magazine</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/fhwa-focus-magazine-april-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geotechnical Information Practices in Design-Build Projects</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/geotechnical-information-practices-in-design-build-projects/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=geotechnical-information-practices-in-design-build-projects</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/geotechnical-information-practices-in-design-build-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals/Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies / Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/16/geotechnical-information-practices-in-design-build-projects/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 429: Geo-technical Information Practices in Design-Build Projects addresses how states use geotechnical information in solicitation documents and contracts for design-build highway projects. The report examines current practices regarding the allocation of geotechnical &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/geotechnical-information-practices-in-design-build-projects/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 429: Geo-technical Information Practices in Design-Build Projects addresses how states use geotechnical information in solicitation documents and contracts for design-build highway projects.</p>
<p>The report examines current practices regarding the allocation of geotechnical risk and the level of geotechnical information provided with bid documents, the scope of geotechnical information required after contract award, geo-technical-related performance testing during construction, and contract provisions related to geotechnical design and construction.</p>
<p><a href="http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_429.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read NCHRP Synthesis 429</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/geotechnical-information-practices-in-design-build-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engineering Economic Analysis Practices for Highway Investment</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/engineering-economic-analysis-practices-for-highway-investment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=engineering-economic-analysis-practices-for-highway-investment</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/engineering-economic-analysis-practices-for-highway-investment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals/Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies / Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/16/engineering-economic-analysis-practices-for-highway-investment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 424: Engineering Economic Analysis Practices for Highway Investment explores how U.S. transportation agencies have applied engineering economics&#8211;benefit–cost analyses and similar procedures&#8211;to decisions on highway investments. Read NCHRP Synthesis 424]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 424: Engineering Economic Analysis Practices for Highway Investment explores how U.S. transportation agencies have applied engineering economics&#8211;benefit–cost analyses and similar procedures&#8211;to decisions on highway investments.</p>
<p><a href="http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_424.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read NCHRP Synthesis 424</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/16/engineering-economic-analysis-practices-for-highway-investment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former AASHTO President Bill Ordway Passes Away</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/former-aashto-president-bill-ordway-passes-away/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=former-aashto-president-bill-ordway-passes-away</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/former-aashto-president-bill-ordway-passes-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/14/former-aashto-president-bill-ordway-passes-away/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 11 May 2012 Bill Ordway, a former Arizona transportation director who served as president of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, died April 11 in Flagstaff at the age of 87. Ordway was elected vice &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/former-aashto-president-bill-ordway-passes-away/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 11 May 2012</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p>Bill Ordway, a former Arizona transportation director who served as president of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, died April 11 in Flagstaff at the age of 87.</p>
<p>Ordway was elected vice president of AASHTO for 1982-83. At the AASHTO Annual Meeting in October 1983 in Denver, Ordway was elected to serve a one-year term as the association&#8217;s president.</p>
<p>During his year leading the association, Ordway focused on such priorities as working with Congress on the types and amounts of federal taxes on trucks in the then-recent Surface Transportation Assistance Act and initiating within AASHTO what he characterized in the January 1984 edition of the AASHTO Quarterly as &#8220;a more orderly grouping of goals and objectives under a strategic and operational plan.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ordway also used that AASHTO Quarterly interview to describe the direction in which he thought AASHTO should be headed. &#8220;I see AASHTO continuing as a premium organization in the technical and research areas through its various committees,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Our trend in the last few years in taking a more pro-active role in developing constructive, in-depth policy along with professional input on major issues, is a direction in which I hope AASHTO will continue to move.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ordway was born in Maine and moved with his family to California in 1930. He attended the California Institute of Technology, leaving in 1942 to join the Army. During his World War II military service, Ordway was a ground school instructor in Wickenburg, Ariz., and a flight instructor for the Army Air Corps. Following the war, he studied engineering studies at Stanford University and graduated from there in 1949. It was during his time at Stanford that he married his wife Nancy.</p>
<p>After starting his transportation career at the Los Angeles County Bridge Division, Ordway moved with his family to Arizona in 1957. He worked as an engineer for the Arizona Highway Department in Tucson, Safford, and Flagstaff. Ordway was named deputy director in 1968 and appointed acting highway director in January 1974. After the agency was replaced with the new Arizona Department of Transportation that July, Ordway became its first director.</p>
<p>The creation of ADOT brought together the Highway Department and the state&#8217;s Department of Aeronautics, in addition to a new division for public transit. Ordway, in organizing and overseeing that transition as director, guided the development of policies and goals defining the new agency&#8217;s broad-based mission and multi-modal transportation priorities throughout the Grand Canyon State. He served as director under four governors and retired in 1985. Ordway&#8217;s other key accomplishments as director included working with the state legislature and business leaders to authorize a five-cent gas tax increase. During his tenure as Arizona&#8217;s transportation director, Ordway was elected president of the Western Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. He also served as chairman of the AASHTO Standing Committee on Planning.</p>
<p>Ordway is survived by his wife, Nancy; daughter, Sue Ordway, and her husband, Drifter Smith; and daughter, Kathy Butler, and her husband, Dave.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/former-aashto-president-bill-ordway-passes-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Carolina DOT Saves Years of Construction and Millions of Dollars on I-385 Rehabilitation</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/south-carolina-dot-saves-years-of-construction-and-millions-of-dollars-on-i-385-rehabilitation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=south-carolina-dot-saves-years-of-construction-and-millions-of-dollars-on-i-385-rehabilitation</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/south-carolina-dot-saves-years-of-construction-and-millions-of-dollars-on-i-385-rehabilitation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Pres. Apps.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/14/south-carolina-dot-saves-years-of-construction-and-millions-of-dollars-on-i-385-rehabilitation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 11 May 2012 &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; When US 276 in northern South Carolina became I-385 in order to accommodate the increase in traffic in the area, initial planning had not included a &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/south-carolina-dot-saves-years-of-construction-and-millions-of-dollars-on-i-385-rehabilitation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 11 May 2012</strong></p>
<p><a name="mainContent"></a></p>
<div>
<div><img src="http://www.aashtojournal.org/PublishingImages/Completed_I-385.jpg" alt="" align="left" border="0" hspace="5" />&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>When US 276 in northern South Carolina became I-385 in order to accommodate the increase in traffic in the area, initial planning had not included a need for substantial upgrades. However, more than 25 years later, the roadway still had not had a reconstruction or rehabilitation.</p>
<p>South Carolina Department of Transportation engineers discovered that the original pavement in Laurens County, more than 50 years old, needed some substantial upgrade in order to meet the needs of the ever-increasing amount of motorists in the coming years.</p>
<p>For the first time in state history for a non-emergency project, SCDOT closed a 15 mile stretch of I-385 for rehabilitation in January 2010, ranging from the Interstate 26 interchange to Gray Court. The three-phase project included asphalt replacement with a thick 10 inches of concrete, a widening of the medians, a bridge replacement, and the raising (by two feet) of six more bridges. In order to save taxpayer dollars and commuting headaches, the goal of the project was simply to &#8220;get in and get out quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p>By closing the highway, SCDOT planned to get the project done in eight months (as opposed to three years if lanes were kept open). This would also save money, as the three-year project would have cost the state $95.5 million. Safety for motorists and those operating in the work zones was also a major factor in closing this portion of the interstate. The public was always kept informed of the project with public informational meetings, media coverage and updates, brochures at all nearby rest areas, and a regularly updated website.</p>
<p>The stretch of rehabilitated roadway officially reopened on July 23, 2010, three weeks ahead of the eight month schedule, and under budget, as the accelerated project cost $60.9 million, amounting to a savings of more than $34 million to South Carolina taxpayers.</p>
<p>&#8220;This was an outstanding effort on the part of our engineers and our partners to be able to rehabilitate this stretch of interstate with such a minimal inconvenience to motorists,&#8221; said SCDOT Secretary Robert St. Onge, Jr.</p>
<p><em>The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials features a Project of the Week in each edition of the AASHTO Journal to highlight excellent state transportation department projects that are completed on time, under budget, and/or using innovative management. To nominate a completed project that meets these criteria, please e-mail editor AT aashtojournal.org. Previous Project of the Week selections are available at <span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://bit.ly/w0Xjgf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">projectprofiles.transportation.org</span></a></span>.</em></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/south-carolina-dot-saves-years-of-construction-and-millions-of-dollars-on-i-385-rehabilitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caltrans&#8217;s Dougherty Named Director</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/caltranss-dougherty-named-director/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=caltranss-dougherty-named-director</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/caltranss-dougherty-named-director/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/14/caltranss-dougherty-named-director/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 11 May 2012 Malcolm Dougherty was appointed Director of the California Department of Transportation Wednesday by Gov. Jerry Brown pending Senate approval, after serving as Acting Director since last year. Dougherty has spent 20 years at Caltrans in &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/caltranss-dougherty-named-director/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 11 May 2012</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p>Malcolm Dougherty was appointed Director of the California Department of Transportation Wednesday by Gov. Jerry Brown pending Senate approval, after serving as Acting Director since last year. Dougherty has spent 20 years at Caltrans in various capacities.</p>
<p>The announcement was made at a ceremony outside the state Capitol to honor three Caltrans employees who lost their lives while working last year.</p>
<p>As Caltrans Director, Dougherty is responsible for one of California&#8217;s largest departments with a budget of more than $13 billion and 20,000 employees who oversee 50,000 lane miles throughout the state&#8217;s transportation system.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/caltranss-dougherty-named-director/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House and Senate Members Press Immediate Need for Action at First Transportation Bill Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/house-and-senate-members-press-immediate-need-for-action-at-first-transportation-bill-conference/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=house-and-senate-members-press-immediate-need-for-action-at-first-transportation-bill-conference</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/house-and-senate-members-press-immediate-need-for-action-at-first-transportation-bill-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/14/house-and-senate-members-press-immediate-need-for-action-at-first-transportation-bill-conference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 11 May 2012 Conferees from both the House and Senate expressed cautious optimism in passing a surface transportation bill during Tuesday&#8217;s first meeting of the Transportation Bill Conference Committee. Conferees from the Senate touted MAP-21, the two-year $109 &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/house-and-senate-members-press-immediate-need-for-action-at-first-transportation-bill-conference/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 11 May 2012</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p>Conferees from both the House and Senate expressed cautious optimism in passing a surface transportation bill during Tuesday&#8217;s first meeting of the Transportation Bill Conference Committee. Conferees from the Senate touted MAP-21, the two-year $109 billion surface transportation bill passed mid-March. The House conferees focused on HR 4348, their proposed 90-day extension of the current surface transportation authorization with the Keystone XL pipeline provisions passed April 18.</p>
<p>The 2 hour 40 minute conference meeting allowed for opening statements from all conferees, including five minutes for all committee chairs and three minutes for all remaining members.</p>
<p>Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-California), who was elected to chair the conference committee, acknowledged that while passing a surface transportation bill will be difficult, it was not out of reach.</p>
<p>&#8220;Now, many pundits and experts have predicted gloom and doom when it comes to this bill,&#8221; Boxer said. &#8220;They were wrong in the past. They said it was over, it was gone, it would never happen, we&#8217;d never pass it through the Senate, the House wouldn&#8217;t act, we wouldn&#8217;t be here. We&#8217;re here.&#8221;</p>
<p>House Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman John Mica (R-Florida), elected the committee vice chairman, agreed with Sen. Boxer that the bill was certainly possible (referencing the passage of an FAA bill after 23 extensions), but stressed that the bill should include serious reform.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let me set some markers,&#8221; said Mica. &#8220;We&#8217;re going to have to pay for this and pay for this responsibly. We&#8217;re not going to raise taxes. Anyone who wants to raise taxes, you&#8217;re on the wrong conference committee. We must not include earmarks. And we can&#8217;t add to federal bureaucracy. We&#8217;ve got to cut red tape and start streamlining the process.&#8221;</p>
<p>Staffers for the conferees will now begin working on the following matters: highways, bridges, roads, and routes; finance; transit; highway safety; RESTORE Act; and any other issues that may be relevant to the bill including the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, the Keystone XL pipeline, and coal ash. The conferees will meet again if necessary before the current extension expires.</p>
<p>A video of the hearing is available at <span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://cs.pn/confercommvideo" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">cs.pn/confercommvideo</span></a></span>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/14/house-and-senate-members-press-immediate-need-for-action-at-first-transportation-bill-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terra E-News: May 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/terra-e-news-may-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=terra-e-news-may-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/terra-e-news-may-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals/Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/10/terra-e-news-may-2012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Transportation Engineering and Road Research Alliance (TERRA), which is coordinated by the University of Minnesota&#8217;s Center for Transportation Studies, has released the latest issue of its quarterly newsletter. The newsletter addresses research on pavement, materials, and related transportation engineering &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/terra-e-news-may-2012/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Transportation Engineering and Road Research Alliance (TERRA), which is coordinated by the University of Minnesota&#8217;s Center for Transportation Studies, has released the latest issue of its quarterly newsletter. The newsletter addresses research on pavement, materials, and related transportation engineering challenges, including issues related to cold climates.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.terraroadalliance.org/publications/enews/2012/02/"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the TERRA Newsletter</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/terra-e-news-may-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi DOT &#8211; Research Division Newsletter &#8211; Spring 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/mississippi-dot-research-division-newsletter-spring-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mississippi-dot-research-division-newsletter-spring-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/mississippi-dot-research-division-newsletter-spring-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals/Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/10/mississippi-dot-research-division-newsletter-spring-2012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Newsletter contains: 2012 MDOT Research Needs Workshop High RAP Content in Pavement Surface Layers Shrinkage and Durability Study of Bridge Deck Concrete MDOT Implementation Plan for GPS Technology in Planning, Design and Construction Delivery Calendar of Events Read the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/mississippi-dot-research-division-newsletter-spring-2012/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Newsletter contains:</p>
<ul>
<li>2012 MDOT Research Needs Workshop</li>
<li>High RAP Content in Pavement Surface Layers</li>
<li>Shrinkage and Durability Study of Bridge Deck Concrete</li>
<li>MDOT Implementation Plan for GPS Technology in Planning, Design and Construction Delivery</li>
<li>Calendar of Events</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://www.pavementpreservation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/spring2012.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Newsletter</span></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/mississippi-dot-research-division-newsletter-spring-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Would Proposed Fuel Economy Standards Affect the Highway Trust Fund?</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/how-would-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-affect-the-highway-trust-fund/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-would-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-affect-the-highway-trust-fund</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/how-would-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-affect-the-highway-trust-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/10/how-would-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-affect-the-highway-trust-fund/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Congressional Budget Office has released a report that examines how a proposed rule to tighten fuel economy standards for cars, pick-up trucks, and other light-duty vehicles would affect cash flows of the Highway Trust Fund. Read the Report]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Congressional Budget Office has released a report that examines how a proposed rule to tighten fuel economy standards for cars, pick-up trucks, and other light-duty vehicles would affect cash flows of the Highway Trust Fund.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/05-02-CAFE_brief.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Report</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/how-would-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-affect-the-highway-trust-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Construction of Field Cast Ultra-High Performance Concrete Connections</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/construction-of-field-cast-ultra-high-performance-concrete-connections/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=construction-of-field-cast-ultra-high-performance-concrete-connections</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/construction-of-field-cast-ultra-high-performance-concrete-connections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bridge Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies / Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/10/construction-of-field-cast-ultra-high-performance-concrete-connections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Federal Highway Administration has released a report that explores issues to consider when deploying ultra-high performance concrete construction material for the construction of prefabricated bridge elements and systems. Read the Report]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Federal Highway Administration has released a report that explores issues to consider when deploying ultra-high performance concrete construction material for the construction of prefabricated bridge elements and systems.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/bridge/12038/12038.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Report</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/construction-of-field-cast-ultra-high-performance-concrete-connections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long-Term Plan for Concrete Pavement Research and Technology—The Concrete Pavement Road Map (Second Generation): Volume I, Background and Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/long-term-plan-for-concrete-pavement-research-and-technology-the-concrete-pavement-road-map-second-generation-volume-i-background-and-summary/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=long-term-plan-for-concrete-pavement-research-and-technology-the-concrete-pavement-road-map-second-generation-volume-i-background-and-summary</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/long-term-plan-for-concrete-pavement-research-and-technology-the-concrete-pavement-road-map-second-generation-volume-i-background-and-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals/Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Pres. Apps.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies / Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/10/long-term-plan-for-concrete-pavement-research-and-technology-the-concrete-pavement-road-map-second-generation-volume-i-background-and-summary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Federal Highway Administration has released the first volume of a report that explores a strategic plan for concrete pavement research and technology transfer. The report includes 12 research tracks and is designed to help guide the investment of &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/long-term-plan-for-concrete-pavement-research-and-technology-the-concrete-pavement-road-map-second-generation-volume-i-background-and-summary/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Federal Highway Administration has released the first volume of a report that explores a strategic plan for concrete pavement research and technology transfer. The report includes 12 research tracks and is designed to help guide the investment of research dollars.</p>
<p>Volume I explores why the research plan is needed, how it was developed, and what the plan includes. This volume also describes the research management plan that will guide the conduct and implementation of the research.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/pccp/11065/11065.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Report</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/10/long-term-plan-for-concrete-pavement-research-and-technology-the-concrete-pavement-road-map-second-generation-volume-i-background-and-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Lawmakers Question Columbia River Crossing Height</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/republican-lawmakers-question-columbia-river-crossing-height/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=republican-lawmakers-question-columbia-river-crossing-height</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/republican-lawmakers-question-columbia-river-crossing-height/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bridge Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/republican-lawmakers-question-columbia-river-crossing-height/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Warne Report, 4 May 2012 The Columbian – May 2, 2012 Three U.S. representatives from Washington are questioning the planned height of the Columbia River Crossing in Oregon, which is currently 95 feet. The Republican lawmakers say that because &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/republican-lawmakers-question-columbia-river-crossing-height/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Warne Report, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<div><em>The Columbian – </em>May 2, 2012</div>
<p>Three U.S. representatives from Washington are questioning the planned height of the Columbia River Crossing in Oregon, which is currently 95 feet. The Republican lawmakers say that because a 116 feet clearance is required for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dredging vessels, the height problems could affect river shipments all the way to Idaho.</p>
<p>“If the USACE is unable to gain safe passage for their dredges, it could result in river closure, with the loss of millions of dollars per day to the regional economy,” according to a letter signed by Washington Reps. Jaime Herrera Beutler, Doc Hastings and Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Idaho Rep. Paul Labrador.</p>
<p>“We have been advised that the CRC’s own consultant warned that a clearance of 125 feet was needed in order to avoid impediments to navigation,” the letter continues. “Was this information taken into account for design purposes?”</p>
<p>The representatives’ letter to Columbia River Crossing project manager Nancy Boyd asks whether planners have taken into account that the river carries more than $3 billion in cargo each year as the fourth largest river in North America. Lawmakers also requested an updated cost from the current $3.5-billion estimate with the increased bridge height.</p>
<p>In an email, Boyd said, “We have been working closely with the Coast Guard and the Army Corps since 2005 and will continue that collaboration as we finalize our permit application.” She noted that the project also must take into consideration the air clearance required for the Portland International Airport and Pearson Field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/republican-lawmakers-question-columbia-river-crossing-height/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois DOT to cut Spending by 20% over Six Years</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/illinois-dot-to-cut-spending-by-20-over-six-years/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=illinois-dot-to-cut-spending-by-20-over-six-years</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/illinois-dot-to-cut-spending-by-20-over-six-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/illinois-dot-to-cut-spending-by-20-over-six-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Warne Report, 4 May 2012 IDOT News Release – April 30, 2012 SPRINGFIELD – Illinois Transportation Secretary Ann L. Schneider unveiled “Transforming Transportation for Tomorrow,” the state’s first multi-modal transportation improvement program. The new program document combines IDOT’s newly &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/illinois-dot-to-cut-spending-by-20-over-six-years/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Warne Report, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<div><em>IDOT News Release – </em>April 30, 2012</div>
<p><em>SPRINGFIELD – </em>Illinois Transportation Secretary Ann L. Schneider unveiled “Transforming Transportation for Tomorrow,” the state’s first multi-modal transportation improvement program. The new program document combines IDOT’s newly proposed six year highway program with the proposed multi-year programs for public transportation, rail and aeronautics.</p>
<p>The six-year plan contains an anticipated level of $9.2 billion, including $1.8 billion for the 2013 annual program alone. The plan includes $6.5 billion in federal and $2.2 billion in state funding. The costs include the final $1.2 billion targeted from the state’s Illinois Jobs Now! capital plan and $454 million in local funds. The highway program will create or sustain nearly 120,000 jobs through 2018 and spark economic development throughout the state. The highway program includes maintenance of 2,302 miles of road and replacement or rehabilitation of 508 bridges.</p>
<p>In addition, state highways will see $6.6 billion in improvements over the life of the program, with $2.6 billion targeting the local highway system. In the state portion of the program, $3 billion will be for reconstruction, resurfacing, widening and other safety projects; $1.5 billion for bridge needs; $1.4 billion for congestion mitigation and $756 million for new roads and increased access for economic development.</p>
<p>Enacted in 2009 to include a $14 billion, six-year transportation improvement plan, Gov. Quinn’s Illinois Jobs Now! program has invested more than $9.5 billion in the state’s highways system alone from 2009 through 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/illinois-dot-to-cut-spending-by-20-over-six-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mich. Supreme Court Rejects Ambassador Bridge Owners’ Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/mich-supreme-court-rejects-ambassador-bridge-owners-appeal/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mich-supreme-court-rejects-ambassador-bridge-owners-appeal</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/mich-supreme-court-rejects-ambassador-bridge-owners-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bridge Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/mich-supreme-court-rejects-ambassador-bridge-owners-appeal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Warne Report, 4 May 2012 Detroit Free Press – April 28, 2012 DETROIT – Michigan’s Supreme Court has denied an appeal by the Ambassador Bridge owners’ to regain command of the $230 million Gateway Project under dispute at the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/mich-supreme-court-rejects-ambassador-bridge-owners-appeal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Warne Report, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<div><em>Detroit Free Press – </em>April 28, 2012</div>
<p><em>DETROIT – </em>Michigan’s Supreme Court has denied an appeal by the Ambassador Bridge owners’ to regain command of the $230 million Gateway Project under dispute at the bridge. The brief ruling upheld the earlier ruling from the Court of Appeals which denied the Detroit International Bridge Co.’s appeal of a local judge’s ruling to give control of the project to the Michigan Department of Transportation to finish.</p>
<p>In a five-line ruling Friday, the Supreme Court rejected the bridge company’s appeal, “because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this court.”</p>
<p>The Gateway project is designed to ease border congestion by connecting the Ambassador Bridge directly to local expressways with new ramps and roads. MDOT and DIBC agreed in a 2004 contract to jointly construct the project. MDOT sued DIBC in 2009 however, saying the bridge company had not built its portion of the project. Instead, according to MDOT, DIBC built a duty-free facility and a ramp for a second new bridge that is in conflict with Gateway. Since a Wayne County Circuit judge turned control of the project over to MDOT, the department has demolished the Pier 19 “bridge to nowhere” ramp.</p>
<p>MDOT spokesman Jeff Cranson said the department is satisfied with the court’s action. “We are still very much on schedule to complete this thing on a rapid pace,” he said. The full project is expected to be completed this September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/mich-supreme-court-rejects-ambassador-bridge-owners-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Road Construction money Went to Jobs Program under Blagojevich</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/report-road-construction-money-went-to-jobs-program-under-blagojevich/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=report-road-construction-money-went-to-jobs-program-under-blagojevich</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/report-road-construction-money-went-to-jobs-program-under-blagojevich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/report-road-construction-money-went-to-jobs-program-under-blagojevich/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Warne Report, 4 May 2012 WBBM Newsradio – May 1, 2012 SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – The Illinois executive inspector says the state transportation department paid $3.1 million in road funding toward a summer jobs program in Chicago under pressure from &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/report-road-construction-money-went-to-jobs-program-under-blagojevich/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Warne Report, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<div><em>WBBM Newsradio – </em>May 1, 2012</div>
<p><em>SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – </em>The Illinois executive inspector says the state transportation department paid $3.1 million in road funding toward a summer jobs program in Chicago under pressure from Gov. Rod Blagojevich during his administration. State transportation Secretary Ann Schneider says she approved the payments as Blagojevich’s Transportation Department finance director under urging from the governor’s office for rapid payment of the $3.1 million to five nonprofits participating in the jobs program.</p>
<p>She said she approved the checks from the state’s highway fund despite proof that participants were performing ineligible, non-transportation-related tasks such as rearranging furniture and working at golf courses. The $7.8 million program was part of Blagojevich’s response to an increase in Chicago shootings in 2008. The governor’s Department of Human Resources was in charge of the program and used IDOT’s road fund to pay for it.</p>
<p>“We were trying to slow it down to make sure there were commonplace safeguards in place, but there was a great deal of pressure to get this done in a very short timeframe,” Schneider said in an interview with the Associated Press. Auditors agreed to a repayment of $644,000 – largely from unpaid payroll taxes -, saying that while much more money was likely misspent, proving it would mean long legal fights over individual timesheets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/report-road-construction-money-went-to-jobs-program-under-blagojevich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia DOT Chooses Highly Modified Asphalt for Busy Intersection</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/georgia-dot-chooses-highly-modified-asphalt-for-busy-intersection/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=georgia-dot-chooses-highly-modified-asphalt-for-busy-intersection</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/georgia-dot-chooses-highly-modified-asphalt-for-busy-intersection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Pres. Apps.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies / Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/georgia-dot-chooses-highly-modified-asphalt-for-busy-intersection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dixie Contractor, Volume 84, Number 10, October 2010 A new type of asphalt binder that was developed to improve pavement durability and resistance to rutting and shoving is being tested by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) at the junction &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/georgia-dot-chooses-highly-modified-asphalt-for-busy-intersection/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dixie Contractor, Volume 84, Number 10, October 2010</strong></p>
<p>A new type of asphalt binder that was developed to improve pavement durability and resistance to rutting and shoving is being tested by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) at the junction of two busy state highways in Henry County.</p>
<p>GDOT approved the substitution of Kraton highly modified asphalt binder (HiMA) for the binder originally specified for a Superpave hot mix overlay that was recently installed by C.W. Matthews Contracting Co., Inc. at the intersection of Routes 138 and 155 in Stockbridge.</p>
<p>The agency is concerned about pavement rutting and shoving at the intersection, which is located at the foot of a hill and experiences repeated hard braking by motorists. Vehicle travel has risen dramatically in recent years in Henry County, which is part of the fast growing Atlanta Metropolitan Area, while Stockbridge is the county’s largest city.</p>
<p>“The population has been growing in the Stockbridge area, and those two state highways serve as corridors to several Interstates,” said Peter Wu, P.E., who is responsible for technical assistance in GDOT’s Office of Materials and Research. “This means there’s a lot of traffic going through that intersection – about 25,000 vehicles a day – and about 1,400 of those are trucks,” he said. Wu explained that paving was part of a larger contract awarded to C.W. Matthews to reconstruct the intersection, including widening and adding turning lanes in each direction. He added that specifications originally called for a Superpave overlay using a performance graded PG 76-22 asphalt binder but GDOT area office personnel agreed to allow the use of HiMA at the request of C.W. Matthews on behalf of Kraton Polymers LLC, which developed and manufactures its newest SBS polymer modifier and wished to demonstrate its effectiveness.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://www.pavementpreservation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/DXC-Oct2010_feature2-2.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Full Article</span></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/georgia-dot-chooses-highly-modified-asphalt-for-busy-intersection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Clears Hurdle in Completing Vital Border Crossing</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/michigan-clears-hurdle-in-completing-vital-border-crossing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=michigan-clears-hurdle-in-completing-vital-border-crossing</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/michigan-clears-hurdle-in-completing-vital-border-crossing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bridge Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/michigan-clears-hurdle-in-completing-vital-border-crossing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012 The Michigan Supreme Court rejected an appeal filed by the owners of Michigan&#8217;s Ambassador Bridge last Friday, preventing the owners from regaining control of Michigan Department of Transportation&#8217;s Gateway Project. The Gateway Project was designed &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/michigan-clears-hurdle-in-completing-vital-border-crossing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p>The Michigan Supreme Court rejected an appeal filed by the owners of Michigan&#8217;s Ambassador Bridge last Friday, preventing the owners from regaining control of Michigan Department of Transportation&#8217;s Gateway Project.</p>
<p>The Gateway Project was designed to relieve heavy border crossing traffic by connecting the Ambassador Bridge to expressways by multiple new ramps and roads. Ambassador Bridge owner Detroit International Bridge Co. partnered with MDOT in 2004 to build the project, but MDOT charged in 2009 that DIBC did not construct the portion of the project it was granted to build. MDOT gained control of DIBC&#8217;s pieces of the Gateway project in order to make sure it is completed, and with the recent ruling, will be keeping them.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are pleased that the Michigan Supreme Court has again sided with the State of Michigan in its efforts to honor the taxpayers&#8217; investment in a safe and more efficient border crossing for commerce and travelers between the U.S. and Canada,&#8221; said MDOT Communications Director Jeff Cranson in a statement.</p>
<p>The $230 million project is scheduled to open its truck route sometime this month, while the entire project is still on track to be completed in September. More information on the Gateway Project is available at <span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://1.usa.gov/MIGateway" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">1.usa.gov/MIGateway</span></a></span>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/michigan-clears-hurdle-in-completing-vital-border-crossing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swaim-Staley to Step Down from Maryland DOT Top Position</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/swaim-staley-to-step-down-from-maryland-dot-top-position/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=swaim-staley-to-step-down-from-maryland-dot-top-position</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/swaim-staley-to-step-down-from-maryland-dot-top-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/swaim-staley-to-step-down-from-maryland-dot-top-position/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012 Maryland Department of Transportation&#8217;s first female CEO has announced her departure after 25 years of service to the state of Maryland. Beverly Swaim-Staley will be stepping down July 1 after almost three years as MDOT &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/swaim-staley-to-step-down-from-maryland-dot-top-position/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<p>Maryland Department of Transportation&#8217;s first female CEO has announced her departure after 25 years of service to the state of Maryland.</p>
<p>Beverly Swaim-Staley will be stepping down July 1 after almost three years as MDOT Secretary. Prior to her appointment by Gov. Martin O&#8217;Malley, Swaim-Staley served as Deputy Transportation Secretary from 2007-2009, a position she also filled from 1999-2003. She has also served as Chief Financial Officer for MDOT and Executive Director of the Maryland Aviation Administration on an interim basis.</p>
<p>&#8220;It has been an honor to serve the citizens of Maryland throughout my professional career,&#8221; Swaim-Staley said in a statement. &#8220;I chose to make transportation the focus of my government service because I believe it is one of those key areas of government where you can make a positive impact on the lives of citizens across the state. I thank Governor O&#8217;Malley and the citizens of Maryland for this tremendous opportunity. I also thank the thousands of employees throughout MDOT who made our collective progress possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Swaim-Staley serves on AASHTO&#8217;s Board of Directors and is Chair of AASHTO&#8217;s Standing Committee on Finance and Administration. Also within AASHTO, Swaim-Staley is a member of the Climate Change Steering Committee and the High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Leadership Group. She is also President of the Board of Directors for the Northeast Association of State Transportation Officials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/swaim-staley-to-step-down-from-maryland-dot-top-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I-95 Coalition Report Explores Mileage-Based User Fees as a Transportation Funding Alternative</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/i-95-coalition-report-explores-mileage-based-user-fees-as-a-transportation-funding-alternative/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=i-95-coalition-report-explores-mileage-based-user-fees-as-a-transportation-funding-alternative</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/i-95-coalition-report-explores-mileage-based-user-fees-as-a-transportation-funding-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/i-95-coalition-report-explores-mileage-based-user-fees-as-a-transportation-funding-alternative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012 The potential implementation of mileage-based user fees as one solution to the nation&#8217;s surface transportation funding problems could pose major technological, administrative, financial, and political challenges but would not be out of the question, concludes &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/i-95-coalition-report-explores-mileage-based-user-fees-as-a-transportation-funding-alternative/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p>The potential implementation of mileage-based user fees as one solution to the nation&#8217;s surface transportation funding problems could pose major technological, administrative, financial, and political challenges but would not be out of the question, concludes a report prepared for the I-95 Corridor Coalition under the direction of its Policy and Strategic Planning Committee.</p>
<p>The report provides a case study of the operating environments and conditions in Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania and addresses the extent to which the current administrative functions and configurations within those states might facilitate a possible transition from the existing highway financing structure to what would be required for a mileage-based user fee system to take effect.</p>
<p>As the report outlines, the transition period during which a state adopts a user fee system would be lengthy. &#8220;However, it is important from the outset to keep a long-range vision in view as technology evolves and initial administrative, institutional, and legal changes are made to implement (a mileage-based) system,&#8221; the report states.</p>
<p>Widespread public education efforts on mileage-based user fees are vital for these states in order to help the public understand how the funding system would work. Also, it would help to curb questions on complexity of this user fee by comparing it to another program already well-established (E-ZPass electronic tolling, for example).</p>
<p>In order to see how the program would work over a broader and longer-term period, the report suggested a large-scale pilot program that involves several adjacent states and thousands of participants. Federal assistance, however, would be necessary to adequately fund that type of project and also help set standards for equipment to record and report on mileage.</p>
<p>&#8220;States should not wait until a (mileage-based user fee) system is ready for large-scale implementation to address immediate surface transportation revenue needs,&#8221; the report states. &#8220;But while they look to other solutions for short-term revenue enhancements, they still can be exploring issues regarding implementation of (mileage-based user fee) systems in the intermediate to long term.&#8221;</p>
<p>The 113-page report, &#8220;Concept of Operations for the Administration of Mileage-Based User Fees in a Multi-state Environment,&#8221; is available at <span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://bit.ly/MBUF-Report" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">bit.ly/MBUF-Report</span></a></span>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/i-95-coalition-report-explores-mileage-based-user-fees-as-a-transportation-funding-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBO Report Finds Proposed Fuel Economy Standards Could Add to Highway Trust Fund Shortfall</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/cbo-report-finds-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-could-add-to-highway-trust-fund-shortfall/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cbo-report-finds-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-could-add-to-highway-trust-fund-shortfall</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/cbo-report-finds-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-could-add-to-highway-trust-fund-shortfall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/cbo-report-finds-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-could-add-to-highway-trust-fund-shortfall/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012 A Congressional Budget Office report released earlier this week highlights what transportation industry experts have worried about for years. The federal surface transportation program could face even further transportation funding shortfalls if newly proposed fuel &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/cbo-report-finds-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-could-add-to-highway-trust-fund-shortfall/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p>A Congressional Budget Office report released earlier this week highlights what transportation industry experts have worried about for years. The federal surface transportation program could face even further transportation funding shortfalls if newly proposed fuel economy standards are adopted.</p>
<p>The report examines the rule proposed in 2011 by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to tighten corporate average fuel economy standards between 2017 and 2025 in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. During that time, the average fuel economy is expected to jump to 49.6 mpg by 2025, up from 34.1 mpg, the expected average for 2016.</p>
<p>CBO estimates that the proposed CAFE standards would lower gas tax revenues over time until they fall by 21 percent, an effect that would not be felt until 2040.</p>
<p>CBO projects that Highway Trust Fund would lose $57 million more than currently expected in gas tax collection between 2012 and 2022. The full 21 percent reduction in gas tax revenues, however, would not happen for close to 30 years.</p>
<p>CBO&#8217;s recommendations included reducing spending on transportation infrastructure, transferring more money from the general fund to the Highway Trust Fund, and raising Highway Trust Fund revenue through gas tax increases or other funding sources.</p>
<p>The 10-page report, &#8220;How Would Proposed Fuel Economy Standards Affect the Highway Trust Fund?&#8221; is available online at <span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://1.usa.gov/HTF-fuel-CBO" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">1.usa.gov/HTF-fuel-CBO</span></a></span>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/cbo-report-finds-proposed-fuel-economy-standards-could-add-to-highway-trust-fund-shortfall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House and Senate to Conference Next Week on Transportation Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/house-and-senate-to-conference-next-week-on-transportation-bill/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=house-and-senate-to-conference-next-week-on-transportation-bill</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/house-and-senate-to-conference-next-week-on-transportation-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative / Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/09/house-and-senate-to-conference-next-week-on-transportation-bill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012 Conferees from both the House and Senate are scheduled to meet Tuesday next week to begin formal negotiation toward a surface transportation reauthorization proposal. The 14 senators chosen by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/house-and-senate-to-conference-next-week-on-transportation-bill/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AASHTO Journal, 4 May 2012</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p>Conferees from both the House and Senate are scheduled to meet Tuesday next week to begin formal negotiation toward a surface transportation reauthorization proposal.</p>
<p>The 14 senators chosen by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, and the 33 representatives appointed by House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, will attempt to work out the differences between the House and Senate proposals.</p>
<p>The House brings HR 4348 to the table, a 90-day extension of the current surface transportation authorization and the Keystone Pipeline provisions passed April 18. The Senate is presenting MAP-21, a two-year $109 billion surface transportation reauthorization bill that passed in mid-March.</p>
<p>The current transportation extension will expire June 30 of this year.</p>
<p>A full list of House and Senate conferees is available at <span style="color: #0000ff"><a href="http://bit.ly/AJconferees" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">bit.ly/AJconferees</span></a></span>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/09/house-and-senate-to-conference-next-week-on-transportation-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News From the International Grooving &amp; Grinding Association</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/04/news-from-the-international-grooving-grinding-association/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=news-from-the-international-grooving-grinding-association</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/04/news-from-the-international-grooving-grinding-association/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 13:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals/Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Design/Const.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavement Pres. Apps.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/04/news-from-the-international-grooving-grinding-association/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CPR for Highway Repairs  State Departments of Transportation across the country face a common challenge: how to repair concrete roadways that may be up to 50 years old in some locations. While replacing or overlaying deteriorated pavement can be time &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/04/news-from-the-international-grooving-grinding-association/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table id="content_LETTER.BLOCK3" width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#a70431"><strong>CPR for Highway Repairs </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> State Departments of Transportation across the country face a common challenge: how to repair concrete roadways that may be up to 50 years old in some locations. While replacing or overlaying deteriorated pavement can be time and cost prohibitive, Concrete Pavement Restoration (CPR) often provides the better solution.</p>
<p><img src="http://ih.constantcontact.com/fs010/1105372907373/img/48.jpg" alt="Interstate 40" width="272" height="204" align="left" border="0" hspace="10" />CPR is a series of engineered techniques developed to manage the rate of pavement deterioration in concrete streets, highways and airports. It is a non-overlay option used to repair areas of distress in concrete pave­ment without changing its grade. This preven­tive procedure restores the pavement to a condi­tion close to or better than original and reduces the need for major and more costly repairs later. Further, CPR addresses the causes of pavement distress, minimizing further deterioration.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>CPR techniques include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Slab stabilization</li>
<li>Full-depth repairs</li>
<li>Partial-depth repairs</li>
<li>Dowel bar retrofits</li>
<li>Cross-stitching longitudinal cracks or joints</li>
<li>Diamond grinding</li>
<li>Next Generation Concrete Surface grinding</li>
<li>Joint and crack resealing</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=n8byvofab&amp;v=0019AZp80hh5E4ubzStElj99no6IjfYltxW0xWi6r1JXLOEuYvKhzQYkSDGMusnkHWv4u0cKhbdUaMHbunSnYLtu3RuQ0g8RJTFZZCIOqOKCVVh27DdbzzNGOicZqMFFq1dw30Lub3wP378U_YFrR94cuHu1a-WgkCi5d5tuFIECvNJTQ9FfUS4op3jq8zHjfQ_Lel5IR9J2-IKez_R8VsZZ-6xKci27rCd"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Newsletter</span></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/04/news-from-the-international-grooving-grinding-association/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Performance Assessment of Road Equipment – State of the Art</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/01/performance-assessment-of-road-equipment-state-of-the-art/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=performance-assessment-of-road-equipment-state-of-the-art</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/01/performance-assessment-of-road-equipment-state-of-the-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies / Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/01/performance-assessment-of-road-equipment-state-of-the-art/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VTI, the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, has released a report that explores the monitoring methods, maintenance measures, and acceptable end user service levels of road equipment in seven European countries: Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/01/performance-assessment-of-road-equipment-state-of-the-art/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VTI, the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, has released a report that explores the monitoring methods, maintenance measures, and acceptable end user service levels of road equipment in seven European countries: Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and UK. The report is written in English.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vti.se/en/publications/pdf/performance-assessment-of-road-equipment.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Report</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/01/performance-assessment-of-road-equipment-state-of-the-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Transportation Researcher (Vol. 48, No.1, 2012)</title>
		<link>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/01/texas-transportation-researcher-vol-48-no-1-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=texas-transportation-researcher-vol-48-no-1-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/01/texas-transportation-researcher-vol-48-no-1-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O'Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals/Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsp2.pavementpreservation.org/2012/05/01/texas-transportation-researcher-vol-48-no-1-2012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) at Texas A&#38;M University, College Station, has released the latest version of its periodic magazine that highlights TTI&#8217;s research, professional, and service activities. Read the Magazine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) at Texas A&amp;M University, College Station, has released the latest version of its periodic magazine that highlights TTI&#8217;s research, professional, and service activities.</p>
<p><a href="http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/researcher/ttr-v48-n1.pdf"><span style="color: #0000ff">Read the Magazine</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tsp2.org/2012/05/01/texas-transportation-researcher-vol-48-no-1-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

